“The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek terms eu meaning good and thanatos meaning death. A “good death” would be one that occurs with minimal pain and distress. In the context of these guidelines, euthanasia is the act of inducing humane death in an animal.”
Animal Angels Expose - - Check out their website - -
- - The Export of American Horses for Slaughter - http://www.animals-angels.com/index.php?pageID=563
~~Horse Slaughter: The Facts-www.animals-angels.com/index.php?pageID=493
~Three Years Investigation Shows Inherent Cruelty of the Horse Slaughter Industry:
http://www.animals-angels.com/index.php?pageID=690
Is this a good death? ~~ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQZzmA3Q63k
In today's political climate, where people are arguing the merits FOR slaughter plants in our country and about the "necessity" of slaughter, let's review this remarkable White Paper written by Dr. Patricia Hogan in 2006. She gave this Testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection July 25, 2006 in Support of the American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act.
It was relevant then, and it's extremely relevant now.
The full White Paper can be read at: http://www.vetsforequinewelfare.org/pdf/Hogan.pdf
In Part Dr. Hogan testified:
"I have personally been to a horse slaughterhouse as a surgery resident while in TexasAdditionally please read on the site of the Veterinarians for Equine Welfare::
Canadian Horse Defense Coalition-i www.defendhorsescanada.org
Graphic evidence of animal welfare violations was documented at Natural Valley Farms in April/May 2008. This footage was released to CHDC by undercover investigators, and the concerns were aired on CBC's No Country for Horses the following month: http://www.cbc.
ON-LINE ARTICLES ~
On "Fugly Horse of the Day, February 17, 2009: After a three year battle, the USDA was finally required to release pictures of horses who were injured or killed during double-decker rides to the slaughterhouse. http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:Z5raPetzt-wJ:fuglyhorseoftheday.blogspot.com/2009/02/you-cant-afford-to-ignore-this-issue.html+sad+day+when+you+can+not+afford+your+horse&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Putting the Horse First?, by Patricia Hogan ~
http://cs.bloodhorse.com/blogs/finalturn/archive/2009/03/10/Putting-the-Horse-First_3F00_.aspx
"It is the united opinion of VEW (Veterinarians for Equine Welfare) that horse slaughter is inhumane, and that it is an unacceptable way to end a horse’s life under any circumstance. One need only observe horse slaughter to see that it is a far cry from genuine humane euthanasia. From the transport of horses on inappropriate conveyances for long periods of time without food, water of rest to the very ugly slaughter process in which horses react with pain and fear, no evidence exists to support the claim that horse slaughter is a form of humane euthanasia. Rather, it is a brutal process that results in very tangible and easily observable equine suffering.
It is worth noting that the suffering of horses in slaughter is accentuated by the very fact that they are not raised for slaughter. Horses going to slaughter have largely been accustomed to close human contact whether through racing, ranch work, pleasure riding, rodeo or any of the other ways in which horses are used in this country. While some are purposely sold into slaughter by their owners most end up at the abattoir through pure bad luck: they were sold at auction and the winning bidder was a ‘killer-buyer’ working for one of the slaughter plants. To suddenly be treated as pure livestock must be disorienting and frightful, and can only compound their suffering as they proceed to slaughter.
We believe that it is an unethical and dangerous practice for the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) to attempt to equate horse slaughter with humane euthanasia."
From "Horse Slaughter – Its Ethical Impact and Subsequent Response of the Veterinary Profession", by Veterinarians for Equine Welfare (2008)
Please check out the website for Veterinarians for Equine Welfare - -http://www.vetsforequinewelfare.org/index.php
↔
The Realities of Horse Slaughter In America
Information compiled and essay written by Anne Irving, a tireless fighter against the horrors of Horse Slaughter in America. Thank you for taking the time to read this . . .
Horse slaughter is an industry, not a charitable way for farmers to dispose of their old, sick, horses as believed by many in Congress and across the country. It is an industry driven by demand of foreign diners in Europe and
Background: In 2007, two slaughter plants in
A demand-driven business: Kill buyers deliver the number of horses that they are asked to deliver. The majority of horses slaughtered come via kill buyers, to satisfy their contracts with the slaughter plants. The kill buyer and slaughterhouse operation is not a service that simply disposes of excess horses. Unlucky horses that find their way to slaughter include yearlings, very pregnant mares (their near-term foals cut out of their stomachs and discarded in a pile), Off-Track Thoroughbreds that didn’t run fast enough (many with very famous bloodlines), and Amish horses - beasts of burden their entire lives, sent to slaughter as their final reward. There are also PMU (Premarin) mares, and their offspring, stolen horses, and yes, the family horse that no longer fits “little Suzy” that is unwittingly sent to slaughter. While some horses are knowingly sold into slaughter by their owners, many, many are not. According to USDA, in 2006, 92% of horses they inspected were young and healthy. The market for slaughter horses is set by the international demand for their meat in other countries, not by the number of supposedly unwanted horses. This can be clearly seen in the fact that following the closing of the US based plants, exports to Canadian and Mexican plants increased to quickly bring the total slaughter back the same level as before the closings.
It is estimated there are approximately 9 million horses in the
Horse slaughter engenders inhumane and illegal behavior. Horses are crammed in double-decker trailers for cross-country journeys that stretch for hundreds of miles. Double-deckers are the preferred means of transportation for the slaughter business as they are more cost effective. While horses can no longer legally ship in Double-decker trailers in the
In
While hauling 59 young horses, mainly Belgians, a double-decker truck found to be grossly overweight by the authorities crashed on October 20th 2007, near
Thirty-six months after making a Freedom of Information Request of the U.S.D.A. regarding violations of the “Commercial Transportation of Equines to Slaughter Act”, Julie Caramante, an investigator for non-profit Animal Angels, received the documents. "I've been an equine cruelty investigator for a number of years," said Caramante, "and I've witnessed many horrific incidents of animal cruelty. But nothing could prepare me for the images contained in the FOIA. These pictures shocked me to the core. The pain and terror these horses endured is criminal. This just should not be, no excuses.” The large FOIA document contains hundreds of photographs that graphically depict horses with open fractures, legs missing, battered and bloody faces, eyeballs dangling and what appears to be horses left to bleed to death. The document provides unimpeachable evidence for the immediate ban on the slaughter of American horses. The photographs included in the FOIA document were taken between January 17, 2005 and November 17, 2005 at Beltex, the Belgian-owned plant in
.
Slaughter-bound horses are put through the auction, into kill pens grouped with many other horses and then shipped to slaughter over long distances in crammed conditions. The entire experience is alien to most horses, which have been well looked after their entire lives. While this experience is exacerbated by the ban on domestic slaughter, even with domestic slaughter horses are drawn from such a large area that it would be commercially unviable to have enough slaughter plants to reduce the transport distances to humane levels. When horse slaughter was legal in
The process of slaughter in the
The conditions that American horses encounter in
Supporters of horse slaughter, such as livestock producers, cite the “slippery slope” argument: first horses, then cattle and hogs. They also argue that it violates their property rights. Prominent among the opposition is the Farm Bureau, The American Quarter Horse Association, and the American Veterinary Medical Association. Responsible breeding is a large factor in this issue and is desperately needed. This presents a problem to the AQHA and other breed registries whose budgets depend on registration fees for new foals. Slaughter gives the breeders a convenient outlet for those horses they do not want to keep. AVMA’s largest constituency consists of veterinarians who service the food animal industry, such as vets who work in slaughter plants, livestock auctions, feedlots, etc. They proclaim the captive bolt slaughter method as “humane euthanasia”. To contrast the viewpoint of AAEP and AVMA, Veterinarians for Equine Welfare (VEW) has been established to speak out against the inhumanity of horse slaughter and rigorously condemn the AVMA’s position. The Premarin Industry is also in support of horses going to slaughter. Premarin® is a conjugated estrogen product extracted from pregnant mares' urine (PMU) manufactured by Wyeth-Ayerst Labs, Inc. Reliable estimates indicate there are at least 50,000 production mares on PMU farms, accounting for the births of approximately 40,000 offspring annually. Add in the number of breeding stallions, immature mares, replacement mares, and their foals, the total is considerably greater than 100,000 horses.
Unwanted Horses: There will always be unwanted horses, or unlucky horses, with or without horse slaughter. Horses will be abandoned and neglected; this happened even while slaughter was a legal alternative. The number of horses that are abandoned and neglected is far smaller than the number of horses that are slaughtered. It is important to note that 345,700 horses were butchered in 1990, 107,029 in 1994, and 47,134 in 2000. In the years where the slaughter numbers are down there was no upswing in abused, neglected or abandoned horses. A more prominent factor in abandonment, abuse, and low horse prices in the market are the recent drought and economic conditions causing the increased cost of gas, hay, feed and loss of family farmland due to urban sprawl and corporate farming.
New legislation, HR503, is aimed at stopping the export of horses for slaughter in
Sources of information include the following:
http://www.manesandtailsorganization.org/stats.htm
http://www.netposse.com/netposse_news.horse.thieves.found.guilty.htm
http://www.animals-angels.com/index.php?pageID=675&synlink:docID=i8386&synlink:linkID=48
http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/horsemeat/DCTaxForm1.jpg
http://www.hsus.org/horses_equines/issues/the_facts_about_premarin.html
http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/nov24/Baker081001_AQ_08-0074_dd.pdf
http://kaufmanzoning.net/stlouisdispatch092706.htm
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-horses_webjan05,0,2470954.story
http://www.kaufmanzoning.net/horsemeat/WashintonTimes020706.htm
http://www.vetsforequinewelfare.org/avma_stop.php,
http://vetsforequinewelfare.org/white_paper.php
http://kaufmanzoning.net/image001.jpg,
http://kaufmanzoning.net/image002.jpg
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/02/0208_060208_horse_meat.html
http://www.kaufmanherald.com/articles/2006/03/10/news/news01.txt
Supporters of anti-horse slaughter legislation:
http://www.awionline.org/legislation/horse_slaughter/supporters_of_ahspa.htm
http://www.paulickreport.com/blog/abercrombies-strong-pitch-to-end-slaughter
Dear Horseback Readers,
I feel compelled to respond to the rash of state efforts ( Montana, Illinois, and North Dakota to name just a few) to re-introduce the slaughter of horses in the United States of America. As a professional economist, I find the arguments spouted nationwide to re-invite foreign owned horse killing facilities onto American soil confusing and without merit.
To paraphrase a horse rescuer I know, why is it that upon the observation of an abandoned dog or cat, people jump up and down to preserve the life of that animal, while upon the observation of an abandoned horse, some politician jumps up and down and yells that we need to slit its throat and bleed it out on American soil so that a wealthy connoisseur in Europe or Asia can have a nice horsemeat snack?
According to USDA data, approximately 20 percent more American horses are being exported to Canada and Mexico for slaughter now than were being slaughtered in the US prior to the closure of the foreign owned slaughterhouses in 2007. It is clear that the option to slaughter is readily available: you simply drop off your horse at the nearest auction or make a quick call to the local “kill buyer” and he will be dispatched through the pipeline to a foreign owned slaughter house in one of our NAFTA partners. Any abandoned horse, one would have to presume, is abandoned NOT because there are no slaughter plants in the US. To add to my confusion, there is nothing but anecdotal evidence that horses are being abandoned at a higher rate now than before the closure of the US slaughter plants, and that is because no better data exists: there is no data collected at the state or national level on horse abandonment or neglect. Even if a single year’s observation were available, which it is not, it would not constitute a sample that any statistician would take seriously. And the few independent scientific studies that have been conducted over the years all illustrate the very same result: rates of horse abandonment, neglect and abuse are completely uncorrelated with the availability of local slaughter facilities.
In some of the debate concerning the proposed bills, the idea is even being perpetrated that somehow inviting foreign horse killers back on US soil is part of the solution to the severe recession currently devastating the US economy; the invitation is touted as “economic development” in, for example, Montana. A sort of bizarre economic stimulus package, for states suffering job losses. For those unaware, Americans don’t eat horsemeat. The foreign owned slaughter houses formerly on US soil paid next to no taxes here. All profits were repatriated to the foreign owners in Europe. And agricultural output and employment in America represent 1.2 percent and 0.6 percent of GDP and employment respectively, tiny fractions of aggregate economic activity, as in any industrialized nation; indeed, that is the hallmark of a mature, post-industrial, service based economy such as the United States. You aren’t going to resurrect the US or your own state economy by killing 100,000 horses, an American icon, to satisfy the palette of some French or Japanese gourmand.
The agricultural and breeding interests that finance these new state political efforts want equine slaughter reintroduced on US soil because a) they fear that social and cultural rejection of equine slaughter might actually somehow induce American citizens to stop eating animals that ARE consumed as food here, b) they want to continue to breed for income and US slaughterhouses provide a more convenient venue for routine culling of the scores of less than perfect and commercially non-viable equine products of that breeding, and c) they represent the interests of a small percentage of US citizens who believe they have the right to dispose of their own animal however they choose, even if that involves a socially and culturally unacceptable act which is abhorred by over 70 percent of the US population according to any survey I have ever read.
My understanding is that optimal policy design requires that incentives be altered, if you are going to shift the allocation of economic resources away from the privately profitable but socially undesirable, and towards the socially and culturally desirable. In my opinion the only way that you will halt irresponsible and excess breeding of equines, and irresponsible ownership, is to completely eliminate the slaughter option. While the horse slaughter industry EXISTS because foreigners want to eat horsemeat, it provides an easy reward for those who want to breed as many horses as they choose and dispose of the excess in the manner that they want to, and for owners who will not take responsibility for their horse’s care. Take away that reward with a federal ban on slaughter and export for slaughter, and slap a good tax on the product of any equine breeder, and the politicians currently yelling that we need to kill a bunch of horses may find it much harder to spot one that is abandoned.
We are currently being inundated with arguments that the reintroduction of equine slaughter on US soil is "necessary". The only thing it is necessary for is to fill the pockets of the big breeders and their agricultural associates, and perhaps the pockets of a “bought” politician or two. Apparently the senators and representatives of Montana who just passed a bill to introduce a new horse slaughter plant there care more about fulfilling those needs, than the fact that 85 percent of their own state citizens strongly object to the proposal. Suppose the devastated US economy is making it tough for horse owners and breeders to maintain for their animals in some states? Why is the solution to re-introduce a culturally and socially unacceptable practice with a horrendous USDA record of humane transportation violations? Why, instead, aren’t these states considering the establishment of temporary state funded horse rescues, with jobs in them that provide tax revenue, until the economy recovers and the horses can find homes? Why aren’t they providing additional funding and jobs for Humane Societies and Animal Control agencies to cope with whatever is being claimed that they are having to deal with? Why not do something that BENEFITS HORSES as well as creating some jobs? And why not impose a state tax on horse breeders to help fund it all?
Caroline M. Betts, PhD
Associate Professor
Department of Economics
University of Southern California